충남대학교 외국학술지지원센터

글로벌메뉴

주메뉴

이용안내
원문검색
센터소개
- 소개
- 연혁
- 운영시간
- 조직
게시판
- 이용안내
- 원문검색
- 센터소개
  - 소개
  - 연혁
  - 운영시간
  - 조직
- 게시판

상세정보

|Home >
상세정보

검색결과 돌아가기

부가기능

MARC보기

法治行政을 위한 節次法的保障

상세 프로파일

상세정보
자료유형	학위논문
개인저자	신희용. 유일언
서명/저자사항	法治行政을 위한 節次法的保障/申喜容.
발행사항	대전: 충남대학교 대학원, 2000.
형태사항	vi,115 p.; 26cm.
딸림자료
대등서명	(The) procedural guarantee for the administration by law

학위논문주기	학위논문(석사) --충남대학교 대학원:법학과 공법전공,2000
일반주기	지도교수: 柳一彦
서지주기	참고문헌 : p.109-113.
언어	한국어

소장정보

소장정보

분관대출 서가에 책이 없을 때... 도서 Pick-Up서비스 찾아가는대출서비스 인쇄

메세지가 없습니다
No.	등록번호	청구기호	소장처	도서상태	반납예정일	예약	서비스
1	DM131552	법학T 1F1 000-2	법학도서관/5층 학위논문/	대출불가(별치)
2	DM131553	법학T 1F1 000-2 c.2	법학도서관/5층 학위논문/	대출불가(별치)

초록

초록

초록 일부

초록 전체

There are complexity, multiplicity, speciality, and technicality as characteristics in modern administration. Therefore the necessity for pro post fac-to has been even more increased than ex post fac-to. As a result, The importance of procedural regulations as well as substantial regulations in agency actions has protruded, which required the legislation of procedural regulation.
  This procedural regulation can compensate non-existent or imperfect substantial regulation. Furthermore it obtains fairness, clearness, trust, democratization in modern administration.

  The Administrative Procedure Acts have been legislated since World War Ⅰ. Under the trend, We have made constant efforts to legislate it since 1965. Finally, We legislated An Administration Procedure Act in 1996.

  The purpose of this thesis is to analyze The Administration Procedure Act that is being executed today and the effect of fault and its remedy-possibility in administrative procedure.

  First, the Administrative Procedure Act, being executed today, was made on the basic of the Administrative Procedure Acts of foreign countries and regulations which were legislated on individual statutes in Korea. So I analyze Administrative Procedure Acts of main foreign countries by their legislation order and statutes or past drafts which main administrative procedure was related to in Korea. I point out problems of the Administrative Procedure Act which is being executed today and suggest their improvements.

  Second, because the Administrative Procedure Act was not legislated in the past, in case that procedural rights were not regulated in substantive law, Case Law and theories were focused on the guarantee of procedural rights. But now the procedural rights are guaranteed by legislation of the Administrative Procedure Act. So I urge that our main interests be focused on the effect of agency action and its remedy-possibility that has faults in administrative procedure in the future. Therefore, comparing Administrative Procedure Acts of main foreign countries with Case Law and theories which have been accumulated in Korea, I suggest direction of Case Law and theories in the future.

第 1 章  序  論    1
  第 1 節  硏究의 目的    1
  第 2 節  硏究의 方法과 範圍    3
    Ⅰ. 硏究方法    3
    Ⅱ. 硏究範圍    3

第 2 章  行政節次의 一般理論과 立法例    5
  第 1 節  行政節次의 一般理論    5
    Ⅰ. 行政節次의 槪念    5
      1. 廣義·狹義의 行政節次    5
      2. 近代的·現代的 ...