초록 일부
The purpose of this study is to reflect civil disobedience based on the Ideological of law using exising discussion on the topic. This paper inquires into various opinions on justificatory grounds o...
더보기
초록 전체
The purpose of this study is to reflect civil disobedience based on the Ideological of law using exising discussion on the topic. This paper inquires into various opinions on justificatory grounds of civil disobedience and tries to reveal their problems.
The Indirect democracy as an alternative to the direct democracy are presented. Civil disobedience is one of the direct democracy.
As the demand of civilians grows with the development of civil society, it is expected that civil disobedience will also grow, and it is naturally thrown to the legal court sooner or later. In this sence, the purpose of this study is to evaluate civil disobedience based on the view point of philosophy of law.
The life of every civilized community is governed by laws. Neither peace of mind for the present nor intelligent planning for the future is possible for men who either live without rules or cannot abide by the rule the have. Making rules for the community, and enforcing them, is the job of government. No community can be truly civilized, therefore, without an effective and reasonably stable government.
The principle of national sovereignty of the national award will soon be law. The Major, however, because of the effect of the principle of majority rule democracy becomes law. The Direct democracy, indirect democracy as a supplement of nation is important. Examines the way of seeking the solution of the conflict of opinion between the two groups and between the general will of Rousseau and special commitment.
Thoughtful Americans speak earnestly about how much change is needed, not just elsewhere, but here in the United States.
A legal theory of civil disobedience is a limiter cae between just and unjust law. It is definates as act of protest, deliberately unlawful, consciously, nonviolently, - of course, that is the question the civil disobedience must be nonviolent - and publicly performed. Also actually recognized its legitimacy, according to various views on civil disobedience that can be. Thus, rather than the discussion of the existing works on the principle that civil disobedience is actually will pay more attention. Modern tendency is also more advanced than the civil disobedience and political participation worry that is also true. Direct action in this respect, a new concept has emerged to Direct action, civil disobedience, more conformist than can be said that the system. Also Stable institutions operating in civil disobedience direct action rather than more conformist.
Therefore, the claim that natural law theory, as based on the way in which you can browse to guarantee freedom civil disobedience As a result of the way to ensure that the system can be considered one. Therefore, as previously claimed, the debate about the legitimacy of civil disobedience rather than in actual practice the disobedience of those who claim to need more attention is also examine the legitimacy of the claim that punishment in one basis rather than dealing individually to identify the matter be understood that the individual claims.
Civil disobedience is ought to be comprehencive to the extent that it is permissive to criticize constitution as such and to be justified on the ground of the existing public conception of justice or the commonly shared sense of justice. We ought to try to propose material principle of morality for civil disobedience.
더보기 닫기
분관대출
서가에 책이 없을 때...
도서 Pick-Up서비스
찾아가는대출서비스
인쇄
