| LDR | | 01723camuu2200337 a 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000709462 |
| 005 | | 20080919103500 |
| 008 | | 071017s2008 enk b 001 0 eng d |
| 010 | |
▼a 2007043079 |
| 020 | |
▼a 9780195307795(hardback : alk. paper):
▼c US$19.95 |
| 020 | |
▼a 0195307798(hardback : alk. paper) |
| 040 | |
▼a DLC
▼c DLC
▼d BAKER
▼d BTCTA
▼d YDXCP
▼d C#P
▼d DLC
▼d 225009 |
| 043 | |
▼a n-us--- |
| 050 | 00 |
▼a KF9668
▼b .D47 2008 |
| 082 | 00 |
▼a 345.73/056
▼2 22 |
| 090 | |
▼a 345.73056
▼b 008a |
| 093 | 0 |
▼a 1098577
▼x 법학 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Dershowitz, Alan M. |
| 245 | 10 |
▼a Is there a right to remain silent?:
▼b coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11/
▼c Alan M. Dershowitz. |
| 260 | |
▼a Oxford ;
▼a New York:
▼b Oxford University Press,
▼c 2008. |
| 300 | |
▼a xx, 212 p.;
▼c 22 cm. |
| 440 | 0 |
▼a Inalienable rights series |
| 504 | |
▼a Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index. |
| 505 | 0 |
▼a What is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state. |
| 610 | 10 |
▼a United States.
▼t Constitution
▼n 5th Amendment. |
| 610 | 10 |
▼a United States.
▼b Supreme Court. |
| 650 | 0 |
▼a Self-incrimination
▼z United States. |
| 650 | 0 |
▼a Right to counsel
▼z United States. |
| 650 | 0 |
▼a Police questioning
▼z United States. |
| 650 | 0 |
▼a Civil rights
▼z United States. |
| 990 | |
▼a 신정선
▼b 신정선 |